It’s been a bit of a tough couple of months” the influencer had declared in recent days when returning to social media and repeated it last night, guest of Fabio Fazio on TV: “I was at the center of a wave of hate” he has declared.

“You would think that someone like me would be prepared for a wave of hatred like that, because I am Chiara Ferragni. You are prepared, but nothing prepares you for the violence of certain attacks. Nothing prepares you for the violence that comes from all sides.”

The TV channel’s streaming site is down, a palpable tension throughout the interview. Feeling eyes on you is part of the game but this time it wasn’t the easiest: Chiara Ferragni, under investigation for aggravated fraud for the Pandoro gate, with an ongoing relationship crisis, in search of a change in image, told her truth live on TV.

The Pandoro gate judicial affair

The influencer is being investigated for aggravated fraud as part of the investigation by the Milan Prosecutor’s Office which focuses on the case of the pandoro produced by the Piedmontese company Balocco, with the hypothesis costing the digital entrepreneur a fine of one million euros from part of the Antitrust, for which he filed an appeal with the Lazio Regional Administrative Court – of having implied that, by purchasing the pandoro, research on osteosarcoma and Ewing’s sarcoma would be supported to purchase a new machine – Ferragni reiterated his “in good faith”: “Things could have been done better, certainly but I thought I had done charitable operations in total good faith.”

The relationship with social media

That his private life was also his public was a starting choice, managing emergency situations is a job that is learned, evidently with difficulty. “It’s not a strategy, it’s absurd to even think so”, she replied to Fazio who reported the rumors according to which the Ferragnez collapse was a gigantic fake to distract from legal proceedings. “We were a very social couple, I have had my personal story for 16 years and Federico has had a similar path to me. You can’t ask for privacy because we both gave up privacy, a choice, that’s how it went for us, I think I’ll continue like this because if I am who I am is due to the choice to tell about myself”, said Ferragni in a black suit and loose hair, tight smile, tired eyes. An outfit chosen with care “simple but not chaste, I chose classic the way I like it”. And she added: “I understood that we need to live more in the present, real life, I have never stopped to live in the present and instead social media is not everything, even if it is my dream job, life outside must be lived I was subjected to media pillory, I was terrified of leaving home, I felt surrounded but instead I found fantastic people, going out into the real world helped me a lot.”

The marital crisis

Nothing particularly sensational, rather the admission regarding the marital affair that: “Federico and I are in touch, we are two adult people who love each other, it’s not that from one day to the next we no longer feel in touch. It’s a period We have also had crises in the past but this is a slightly stronger crisis. Now the priority for both of us is to protect our children.”

Codacons: “It’s absurd that we’re still talking about misunderstandings”

Chiara Ferragni’s interview with Fabio Fazio does not convince Codacons and is rejected by the consumer association. “Chiara Ferragni must take the words ‘misunderstanding’ and ‘good faith’ out of her mouth, because when a pandoro is sold through press releases and cartouches that make consumers understand the existence of a link between sales and donations in favor of children suffering from cancer, there cannot be any type of misunderstanding and no error of understanding on the part of citizens”, underlines Codacons. Who also criticizes the host’s approach: “Fabio Fazio should have gone into more detail about the story and the communications linked to the pandoro, in order to better clarify to viewers what were the clear messages launched by Ferragni and Balocco which left no space at all to any misunderstanding”, says the consumer association. “When 300 thousand consumers are deceived, the words ‘misunderstanding’ and ‘good faith’ must be replaced by the words ‘malicious’ and ‘false’, but Fazio just doesn’t get there or pretends not to get there…”, concludes Codacons.

The implosion of Italy’s most famous couple has polarized online data in recent days. After the rumors about the separation of Chiara Ferragni and Fedez, the tag #ferragnez immediately started trending on

The “sentiment” and the decline in followers

The feelings, which records the attitude with which users relate to Ferragni and Fedez, shows a decline in followers and a greater share of positive mood towards the rapper, although the values ​​are quite homogeneous. This data tells us that users are fond of the narrative of the Ferragnez as a couple and have not processed or metabolized this traumatic breakup.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *